rating a tasty burger
it's time we have a scheme for rating the tasty burger
would suggest a points system such as used by the chicken parma dudes
e.g.,
* general flavour (n/5)
* value for money (n/5)
* style/presentation (n/5)
* service/staff coolness and friendliness (n/5)
etc
your comments?
would suggest a points system such as used by the chicken parma dudes
e.g.,
* general flavour (n/5)
* value for money (n/5)
* style/presentation (n/5)
* service/staff coolness and friendliness (n/5)
etc
your comments?
posted by Tasty Burger at
8:01 pm
3 Comments:
Rating system is a good idea, but please not so ordinary... some suggestions for discussion:
- tasty sauce dripingness (n/5 on the drip scale)
-pick of the patty – meat meter
-nice bun barometer
-was it a tasty burger?
By
Anonymous, at 2:22 pm
Hmmm, from having educated curious observers with Pete i'm pretty sure we agree that the basis on which our prestigious organisation was founded was tastiness. I'm still a big fan of just "that is a tasty burger" or "that is not a tasty burger".
Elegant in its simplicity. After all, what else would interest our extensive reader base than yes/no tasty?
This still leaves lot of room to describe diff aspects of a burger, but the final decision is still, "tasty?".
Lockie
By
Anonymous, at 10:07 am
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
I tend to agree with Lockie on this. The burger was either tasty or not, and we are looking for a burger that has that universal tasty quality to it.
Are we attempting to suppose that one man's tasty burger is another man's nasty burger? Heresy!
By
Anonymous, at 6:41 pm
Post a Comment
<< Home